<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why doesn&#8217;t Digg have a category for the Arts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/</link>
	<description>Web Savvy Alternative Blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Announcer</title>
		<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Announcer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why doesn?t Digg have a category for the Arts?...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]My question to the people in charge of digg, if ever they caught wind of this post, would be quite simply: what happened to the fields of art and culture? And don?t tell me you cover ?movies? and ?music? because we know that boils down to Hollywoo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why doesn?t Digg have a category for the Arts?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]My question to the people in charge of digg, if ever they caught wind of this post, would be quite simply: what happened to the fields of art and culture? And don?t tell me you cover ?movies? and ?music? because we know that boils down to Hollywoo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivs</title>
		<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I think the issue digg has is that its audience is already established and really won't change from there. Over at &lt;a href="http://9rules.com/clips/" rel="nofollow"&gt;9rules Clips&lt;/a&gt; (just launched yesterday during our version 6 redesign) we have a large and diverse Community that takes into account many different tastes including &lt;a href="http://9rules.com/art/clips/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Art&lt;/a&gt; &#38; &lt;a href="http://9rules.com/photography/clips/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Photography&lt;/a&gt;. Again digg is in a difficult position because the geek crowd has already established what they like to see on the site so adding a new category probably won't even get noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue digg has is that its audience is already established and really won&#8217;t change from there. Over at <a href="http://9rules.com/clips/" rel="nofollow">9rules Clips</a> (just launched yesterday during our version 6 redesign) we have a large and diverse Community that takes into account many different tastes including <a href="http://9rules.com/art/clips/" rel="nofollow">Art</a> &amp; <a href="http://9rules.com/photography/clips/" rel="nofollow">Photography</a>. Again digg is in a difficult position because the geek crowd has already established what they like to see on the site so adding a new category probably won&#8217;t even get noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artinthepicture.com</title>
		<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Artinthepicture.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I for one would be a great supporter for an Arts &#38; Culture category :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one would be a great supporter for an Arts &amp; Culture category :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CineGamr</title>
		<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>CineGamr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I agree but the categories sort of overlap, films could go to videos. And arts and culture could also fir anywhere else - notice there's no "Animal" section - and just look at the sheer number of articles on animals there are, digg could do we the addition of more categories and subcategories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree but the categories sort of overlap, films could go to videos. And arts and culture could also fir anywhere else - notice there&#8217;s no &#8220;Animal&#8221; section - and just look at the sheer number of articles on animals there are, digg could do we the addition of more categories and subcategories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Permanent Link to Why doesn’t Digg have a c&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Permanent Link to Why doesn’t Digg have a c&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twigged.net/why-doesnt-digg-have-a-category-for-the-arts/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by twigged.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by twigged.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
